Right to Information - A Gateway to battle Corruption

The idea that Government withhold information for your public has become outdated. During the last decade, many countries have enacted legislations on freedom of information. In India, the state Secrets Act 1923 was enacted to safeguard the official secrets. The brand new law intend to disclose information replacing the ' culture of secrecy '. It will promote public accountability that will trim the malpractices, mismanagement, abuse of discretion and bribery etc. - revolution

OBJECTIVES: The object of RTI is to empower the citizens, promote transparency and accountability inside the working of the Government. The Act is a large step towards making the citizens informed about the activities of the Government. Social Activist Aruna Roy has described India's RTI as " the most fundamental law america has seen."

Aftereffect of RIGHT TO INFORMATION: Even though the debate on corruption in the united states rages on, the RTI Act is fast growing as a good anti- corruption tool.

Jan Lok Pal Bill gained tremendous public support with citizens released on the streets of Delhi, Bangalore as well as other cities to voice their anger over corruption. Where RTI has been used by journalists as well as the media, the law features a broad base of users. Earlier right to freedom of speech and expression is granted under Article 19(1) of Constitution, but it requires fair and efficient procedure to help make the freedom of information work. In the first three years, 2 million RTI requests were filed. The foremost and well known movement was by Mazdoor Kissan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) in Rajasthan for that access to village accounts. Case studies and media reports shows that RTI is being used to redress individual grievances, access entitlements for example Ration Cards and pension. The RTI has paved way for informed citizenry which would strengthen the democratic Government asia. With this Act, we could use our to speech and expressions and control the Government activities effectively. The concept of open Government is becoming a reality with the implementation of RTI Act. The RTI could be called a success only if the bureaucracy accepts they have constitutional to serve into.

PROVISIONS OF RTI: Section 3 says all citizens shall have right to information. The Act enforces a duty upon the public authorities to disclosed all the. In V.S.Lee V. Condition of Kerala.. the remedy supplied by Parliament is that wherever there is certainly substantial financial support, the People, have the right to know or information. Section 4(2) states that every public authority shall take constant steps to offer information suo moto for the public. Thus, the police have to give information voluntarily so the public have minimum resort to use this Act. The general public authorities also have to disseminate (making known or communicated the knowledge to the public through notice boards, newspapers, public announcements, media broad casts, internet and inspection of offices of public authority) information widely in any form which is easily accessible for the public. Information can be acquired by request in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or even in official language with the area U/S 6. Here, anyone has to give fees, and when request can't be produced in writing, the Central PIO while stating PIO shall render all assist with make request written form. If the information continues to be provided correctly or within time, it might be made available by appeal or complaint for the Information Commission U/S (8(a) 1). Inside the Registrar General V. K.U. Rajasekar, it had been held that Section 8 of RTI specially relates to the cases of exemption from disclosure or information when such information affects prejudicially the sovereignty and security asia etc. Section 5 says every public authority shall within 100 days of enactment of the Act, designate as many as officers as the Central Public Information Officers or State Public Information Officers. - revolution